Neil
Fellow
I wasn't really having a go at your post Neil, but more likely at how having to submit a custom made pen affected my decision not to enter the October competition. Prior to that competition Jim had mentioned that he might kick the monthly competition into touch because of lack of support. He had many replies, including mine, urging him not to. Although I only had been turning pens for a few weeks I geared myself up for the competition.... turning my newbie 'Masterpieces' with the hope that one would be good enough to enter in the competition.My expectations though, were deflated, when it was suggested that because of the uniqueness of this particular competition a special custom made pen was called for. Because I had neither the expertise or maybe the special tools needed I had no option but to sit this competition out . I am crtainly not against the idea of expanding members abilities at the lathe, but some members including myself are out of their comfort zone still trying to achieve their best yet kit pen; they also may not have the extra machinery needed to complete the task of making a custom pen either.
Please don't get me wrong here I am not against lovley pens being made by those who can and then being shown in competitions. What I am trying to say is : Should I as a newbie even bother to enter, say, a competition for custom made segmented pens when members such as jttheclockman have also entered ?
Maybe just so that everyone gets a chance of winning a competion two months out of the twelve could be set aside for a novice only kit pen competion ?
Not sure if all this twaddle makes any sense ...I'm hopless at converting my thoughts into words.
Luv you all
Ed
Ed,
Wouldn't have minded if your were having a go, honest, can't abide by everyone agreeing with everyone all the time, yuch, its not what healthy debate is about. Hear what you say, about the ability to make a "custom" pen as a new turner. But here's the truth, I've been turning pens for a few years and I'm OK at it, I don't aspire to do what jttheclockman or Peter have done, they're great what they do but not my thing. I like turning wood for the sake of turning wood, I have over two hundred species in my stock and can probably identify most of them more by smell than by look. I had never made one of those bullet pens before I made that trial one included in the "how to" post. Since then there have been some cracking pens posted. In that I am making pens as a living at the moment, I make a pen to a saleable standard and get on with the next one, I don't do custom made pens, the public don't know they are custom made. There was nothing in the making of that pen that could have not been achieved by anyone who has made a pen before, they had the kit to do that, they could have made the bullet.
A custom made pen is simply, in my opinion, one that doesn't conform to the assembly instructions on the website or kit package.
However, I understand that there is an element of experience that will give the more experienced turner an advantage and if that can be overcome by judging ingenuity highly then the playing field may be flattened.
One of the things that should be agreed before the competition goes ahead, is what is the objective. Make a pen isn't very challenging, if we all entered a JR Gents fountain, who would win it - the wood or the turner? Making a pen isn't rocket science and it would be a case of he with the best wood wins, not he with the best developing (or developed ) skills wins.
Pens with a difference challenge the mind as to items like work holding (closed end pens) sequence of working (Jims blackwood centre bands) or turning a wooden cap instead of a metal one for a fountain pen.
I agree (yuch again) with Woody that it is important to develop a competition whereby ingenuity can ascend over experience as otherwise there is little point in having a competition, but the objective has to be defined.
I think.
Dangerous I know.